Return To Silent Hill's Biggest Mistake Should've Been Its Strongest Aspect - MCE Notices | California State Portal

The history of video games that get adapted into movies is one that’s a mixed bag at best. For the longest time, films based on video games were met with widespread disdain from both longtime fans of the franchise and critics. Super Mario Bros., DOA: Dead or Alive, Doom, Tekken, BloodRayne, Mortal Kombat: Annihilation, and Alone in the Dark are several adaptations that seemingly have no fans out there because they’re poorly made films.

However, that trend has managed to change in recent years. Sonic the Hedgehog, The Super Mario Bros. Movie, Pokémon: Detective Pikachu, Tomb Raider, The Angry Birds Movie, and Werewolves Within are some of the newer releases within the past decade or so that received much stronger reception from both gamers and moviegoers. So, when news arrived of Return to Silent Hill, video game lovers had reason to be hopeful. Previous attempts at Silent Hill films were lackluster, to say the least, but this had potential.

It helped that the trailers revealed that Return to Silent Hill was taking a lot from the games, which are held in high regard. Add in the original composer to ensure the music was fitting and Return to Silent Hill looked destined for success, yet it was the reliance on game elements that ultimately spelled its doom.

Return To Silent Hill Adapts A Lot Of Silent Hill 2

When a movie gets released that’s based on a video game, those who played the games often want to see them pull heavily from the source material. Far too often do these adaptations happen and they feel nothing like the games. That was the case with the vast majority of the installments in the Resident Evil film series. Return to Silent Hill opted to go in the opposite direction, with so many pieces of Silent Hill 2 being included.

Although not a direct adaptation of the game, the main plot follows it. The protagonist, James, comes back to the titular town after receiving a letter from his ex, Mary. Once he arrives at the location, he finds several disturbing elements that terrify him. Silent Hill 2 is widely considered the best entry in the game series and is one of the best horror games ever released, so using that as inspiration was a smart move.

The movie also features other characters from Silent Hill 2, from Eddie and Laura to the most memorable monster, Pyramid Head. Even some scenes are filmed at the same camera angle as they were in the games, making it almost look like a shot-for-shot adaptation. It’s the kind of idea that should equal a great movie, yet Return to Silent Hill received overwhelmingly negative reviews.

The Focus On The Game Took Away From Character Development

While it was appreciated that Return to Silent Hill put so much effort into adapting elements from Silent Hill 2, that also ended up being harmful to the overall film. Silent Hill 2 is a pretty dense game with a lot of story to develop and deep themes to explore. If you wanted to hit all notes in an adaptation, a miniseries would be better served because it would allow more time for everything to get its proper due.

Return to Silent Hill clocked in at under two hours, meaning there’s not a lot of time to tackle everything. The film feels like it rushes through elements and in making sure they touched on so many game moments, a few things fell by the wayside. One of them was character development. James comes across as a character without much personality and we never really get a reason to root for him as the protagonist.

He also shares a lot of scenes with Maria, a woman he meets in town who looks identical to his ex, Mary. Jeremy Irvine and Hannah Emily Anderson, who play James and Maria/Mary, are solid actors, yet they don’t seem to have much chemistry, which takes away from the emotional impact of their relationship and that relationship is meant to be the driving force of the plot. Without that bond clicking, the movie simply doesn’t work.

Return To Silent Hill Shows Why Resident Evil Is Doing Something Different

When the trailer dropped for the upcoming new take on Resident Evil, fans of the games weren’t too pleased because it isn’t based on any installment. Director Zach Cregger has admitted that the film is basically a standalone story that’s just set in the world of the franchise without having any characters or anything like that from the games. While it’s understandable that some fans are disappointed with that news, Return to Silent Hill helps prove why that’s a good idea.

Return to Silent Hill is a case of taking a bunch of elements from the games and not making it work. Games, no matter how good the story is, don’t always translate well to the big screen. The previous Resident Evil films already didn’t take much from the games. They use character names and include the likes of the Umbrella Corporation and Nemesis, yet they don’t at all feel like the games. The new Resident Evil doing its own thing is the best route.

Rather than try to reconstruct iconic scenes from the games that have no chance of living up to what we played, doing something totally different offers up a fresh kind of freedom. It’s more important for the end result to actually be a good movie than to be a rehash of what we played. The existing Resident Evil films were mostly poorly received, as was Return to Silent Hill, and we need good movies in these franchises, regardless of whether or not it feels like the games we played.

Future video game adaptations should pay attention to what went wrong with Return to Silent Hill. It may have had everything it needed on paper to be a strong movie based on a legendary video game, yet it showed that you need much more than that to make a film work. It lacked character development, crucial story elements, and a reason to care, so a simple rehash of a successful video game is far from enough.